雅虎香港 搜尋

搜尋結果

  1. 2019年1月12日 · In Hong Kong, the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609) which came into effect on 1 June 2011 (“ Arbitration Ordinance “) expressly provides for statutory duty of confidentiality in arbitration. The 2018 HKIAC Administered Arbitration Rules effective on 1 November 2018 (“ 2018 HKIAC Rules “) also contains similar ...

  2. arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com › 2021/10/28 › hong-kongKluwer Arbitration Blog

    2021年10月28日 · 4 Kluwer Arbitration Blog - 4 / 4 - 13.02.2023. This entry was posted on Thursday, October 28th, 2021 at 8:00 am and is filed under China, Courts, HK Arbitration Week, Hong Kong, Interim measures, PRC You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments (RSS) feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  3. 2016年2月11日 · It is true that the judiciary suggested, as early as 1997, that funding of arbitration proceedings may be permissible. However, the law on this issue remains woolly. Consistent with Hong Kong’s position as a leading international arbitration centre, the judicial authorities are reviewing the issue.

  4. arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com › 2020/07/17Kluwer Arbitration Blog

    2020年7月17日 · 3 Kluwer Arbitration Blog - 3 / 5 - 18.02.2023. 20, in which it stated that the refreshment and suspension rules mentioned above also apply to Hong Kong or foreign-seated arbitrations in addition to arbitrations seated in the Chinese mainland. Hong Kong Section 4(1) of the Limitation Ordinance (Cap. 347) (the “Limitation Ordinance ...

  5. arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com › 2022/10/28 › c-v-dKluwer Arbitration Blog

    2022年10月28日 · 2 Kluwer Arbitration Blog - 2 / 5 - 15.02.2023. distinction between admissibility and jurisdiction of claims in arbitration, in line with international best practice and jurisprudence. In brief, the facts of the case are that the dispute resolution clause in the contract between the parties for the development and building of a satellite ...

  6. 2017年12月18日 · On 30 December 2016, the Supreme People’s Court of China (“SPC”) released Opinion on Providing Judicial Protection for the Development of the Pilot Free-Trade Zones (“Opinion”), which was regarded as allowing ad hoc arbitration in China.

  7. arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com › 2020/07/07 › no-win-noKluwer Arbitration Blog

    2020年7月7日 · 3 Kluwer Arbitration Blog - 3 / 6 - 22.03.2023 argument exists that DBAs are unnecessary if CFAs are available and vice-versa,8) the more compelling view is that CFAs and DBAs each provide a valid method for funding arbitrations when properly regulated.9) ...