搜尋結果
2021年10月27日 · Hong Kong Arbitration Week 2021 is upon us, with a number of exciting in-person, virtual and hybrid events. On 27 October 2021, the ADR in Asia Conference was held, focussing on “ Tomorrow’s Disputes Today ”. After opening remarks by The Honourable Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng GBM, GBS, SC, JP, and an update on developments at the ...
2020年8月10日 · On 1 October 2019, the Arrangement Concerning Mutual Assistance in Court-ordered Interim Measures in Aid of Arbitral Proceedings by the Courts of the Mainland of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (the “ Arrangement ”) came into force. It was previously reported on the blog here and here.
2022年10月23日 · This August, Dr. Mariel Dimsey assumed the position of HKIAC Secretary-General, succeeding Ms. Sarah Grimmer, who served in the position for six years. Mariel brings with her extensive, 15-years’ experience as counsel and arbitrator in international arbitration, spanning various jurisdictions and legal traditions.
2021年10月25日 · Sarah has been HKIAC Secretary-General since September 2016. During her time at the helm, the HKIAC has, among other actions, released its 2018 Administered Arbitration Rules, overseen the changes arising from the 2019 arrangement between Mainland China and Hong Kong regarding interim measures for arbitration (“Interim Measures Arrangement
2020年7月17日 · Pursuant to Article 239 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised in 2017) (the “ Civil Procedure Law ”), the limitation period applicable to applications for enforcement of awards is two years. The starting point for the calculation, and the rules on refreshment and suspension of the limitation period, are worth noting.
2021年9月24日 · The Arrangement allowed Hong Kong to become the first and only arbitral seat outside of Mainland China, where parties can apply for interim measures in Mainland Chinese courts to preserve assets, evidence or conduct. HKIAC’s experience with the Arrangement.
2020年10月22日 · First, what is a bad challenge? As illustrated by the previous session of GAR Interactive of the same day, the “ GAR decision time ”, there are a number of scenarios where parties, in-house counsel and external counsel have had to consider whether a challenge should be brought.
