雅虎香港 搜尋

搜尋結果

  1. 2017年6月1日 · The dispute over the enforcement of an arbitration award (“Award”) between the Astro and Lippo groups of companies has been fought out in numerous jurisdictions, notably Singapore and Hong Kong.

  2. 2020年4月4日 · This is understandable considering that document production tends to be seen as a nightmarish phase in arbitration for junior, senior lawyers and arbitrators alike. This is because, if not handled properly, document production can turn into a very costly and time-consuming exercise…. Continue reading.

  3. 2020年7月17日 · Pursuant to Article 239 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised in 2017) (the “ Civil Procedure Law ”), the limitation period applicable to applications for enforcement of awards is two years. The starting point for the calculation, and the rules on refreshment and suspension of the limitation period, are worth noting.

  4. 2018年1月2日 · The main reasons relied by the court were: (i) Allenberg failed to prove that Zhang was expressly authorized by Nijiaxiang; (ii) based on past practices, Allenberg should check if Zhang was authorized or should request Nijiaxiang to stamp the contract; (iii) except for Contract 381950 (which was also stamped), Zhang had never represented Nijiaxi...

  5. arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com › 2020/09/21 › right-ofKluwer Arbitration Blog

    2020年9月21日 · It refers to a judge’s right to ask, suggest to or require the parties to clarify or supplement their ambiguous, insufficient or improper claims, submissions or evidence. In international arbitration, which is strongly influenced by the adversarial system, arbitral tribunals are usually cautious and reluctant to exercise the right of clarification.

  6. 2018年9月24日 · This blog post will first briefly reveal the results from the research conducted by the author on the issue (I). The next part of this contribution then discusses some possible reasons why Russian courts apply the New York Convention erroneously (II), and some consequences of such practices (III).

  7. 2017年12月18日 · On 30 December 2016, the Supreme People’s Court of China (“SPC”) released Opinion on Providing Judicial Protection for the Development of the Pilot Free-Trade Zones (“Opinion”), which was regarded as allowing ad hoc arbitration in China. On 23 March 2017, the Management Committee of Hengqin New Zone and Zhuhai Arbitration Commission ...

  1. 其他人也搜尋了