搜尋結果
Kant's categorical imperative enables us to decide how we ought to act, regardless of the consequences. It, therefore, differs to a hypothetical imperative (if I want X, I ought to do Y) and is strictly deontological. Kant suggests that we ought to act in a certain manner in order to fulfill our duty. We are able to have knowledge of our duties ...
The Categorical Imperative was devised by Immanuel Kant to provide a set of requirements a maxim (or motivation) must pass in order for the action to be considered a moral obligation. When a Categorical Imperative is established it becomes one’s moral duty to carry out the action under any circumstances. When carrying out this action, the ...
Kant's categorical imperative is a test he created to see if an act is morally wrong. It simply states that 'an act in a particular circumstance is right if and only if you would choose that everyone perform the same act in under the same circumstances'. For example
The first strength can be linked to the quality of universability that Kantian ethics possesses. Since Kantian Ethics is universalised to all humans, it suggests that all humans should be treated equally under the same ethical system. This provides little discrimination according to race, class or age etc. Weaknesses of Kantian Ethics.
To provide the best structured and clearest answer, I will go through the Categorical Imperative step by step, drawing comparison with Christianity. First we shall draw comparison with Kant's qualification of universal law. We can, therefore draw the simple comparison with the ten commandments, providing specific examples, such as thou shall ...
Kant's ethical theory of the categorical imperative presents more weaknesses than it does strengths. The Categorical Imperative is a deontological approach to ethics that does not factor in potential consequences of an action. In this sense it can be argued that a theory such as Act Utilitarianism far more of a better ethical approach to a ...
weaknesses: not flexible idea. each situation is different thus the categorical imperative does not work, if you saying lying is morally wrong but a situation suggests that lying is the morally better thing to do one must lie. we like to look at the end result too much
The categorical imperative is the bedrock of Kant's ethics, and is key to understanding what the basis of deontological duty is. Kant describes - or formulates - the categorical imperative in a number of ways, though it is important to remember that these formulations are for Kant sides of the same coin.
Kant's categorical imperative is stated as "Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law." This is known as Kant's first formulation of the categorical imperative and what this means is that you should always act in a way that you think everyone should act i.e do not perform any actions that you would not want performed on you
Critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Kantian Ethics. Kant sought to provide the moral agent with an intrinsic, deontological, universal system of ethical rules to follow in all situations, in order to work out the correct moral action to take. His ethical system consisted of a 'Categorical Imperative' with three different ...
